<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Vote For Our Next President&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/</link>
	<description>A crazy guy trying to follow God &#38; his random ramblings!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Todd,
            This is what I&#039;m saying. For 10 years I have been looking at the voting records for both parties. On 95% of the social issues the republican voting record comes the closest, not perfect but closest to Christians.  If retired Democratic Senator Zell Miller ran for president today against today&#039;s republican candidates I would for him. We must also remember what ever party is in charge would push the parties agenda. So we must also consider the party I am voting for. You can judge the a party buy the leadership. That is why I gave you the info I did. The Dem&#039;s VOTED Reid &amp; Poloski in, that is where they want to go with policies.
 
Using emotions, not at all. If we debated one on one, I am all facts. I have found emotions got me no where.

Can you give me a good Christian left organization that I can at least take a look at? I would be able to give you a couple of dozen.

Here is a African economist. 
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,363663,00.html

Can a Country change from poor to growth??
http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/bg1958.cfm

Great article that would really help the poor.
http://www.townhall.com/search.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,<br />
            This is what I&#8217;m saying. For 10 years I have been looking at the voting records for both parties. On 95% of the social issues the republican voting record comes the closest, not perfect but closest to Christians.  If retired Democratic Senator Zell Miller ran for president today against today&#8217;s republican candidates I would for him. We must also remember what ever party is in charge would push the parties agenda. So we must also consider the party I am voting for. You can judge the a party buy the leadership. That is why I gave you the info I did. The Dem&#8217;s VOTED Reid &#038; Poloski in, that is where they want to go with policies.</p>
<p>Using emotions, not at all. If we debated one on one, I am all facts. I have found emotions got me no where.</p>
<p>Can you give me a good Christian left organization that I can at least take a look at? I would be able to give you a couple of dozen.</p>
<p>Here is a African economist.<br />
<a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,363663,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,363663,00.html</a></p>
<p>Can a Country change from poor to growth??<br />
<a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/bg1958.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/bg1958.cfm</a></p>
<p>Great article that would really help the poor.<br />
<a href="http://www.townhall.com/search.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.townhall.com/search.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Dan,

I love how you pointed out that you do not vote blindly, but the examples you gave are of two of the most liberal democrats available.

I am also curious as to what you think of my most recent post, &quot;Should Churches Be Green?&quot;

And I am also wondering how it is that you know Kent Chevalier, because I noticed that that is how you have stumbled across my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I love how you pointed out that you do not vote blindly, but the examples you gave are of two of the most liberal democrats available.</p>
<p>I am also curious as to what you think of my most recent post, &#8220;Should Churches Be Green?&#8221;</p>
<p>And I am also wondering how it is that you know Kent Chevalier, because I noticed that that is how you have stumbled across my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-547</guid>
		<description>I have no problems disconnecting from the religious right and connecting with Christ and letting Him be my guide and not politicians.

You have all very valid points and I love how you try to play on emotions and the heart strings of Christians to draw your own conclusions.  Yes, you do also use facts but you use emotions the same way you accuse Democrats of doing.

Let me ask you one question, Dan.  If I were to research out voting records and everything and using my list, I found that the person I felt met a majority of the things on my list was a Democrat and so I voted for them, would you still think that I was a Christian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problems disconnecting from the religious right and connecting with Christ and letting Him be my guide and not politicians.</p>
<p>You have all very valid points and I love how you try to play on emotions and the heart strings of Christians to draw your own conclusions.  Yes, you do also use facts but you use emotions the same way you accuse Democrats of doing.</p>
<p>Let me ask you one question, Dan.  If I were to research out voting records and everything and using my list, I found that the person I felt met a majority of the things on my list was a Democrat and so I voted for them, would you still think that I was a Christian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Fourth, being a Christian we try to live life the way Christ would of, that includes voting. Since Christ never voted (He never had the freedom in those days), we must look at the issues and vote for the candidate that would be both electable and our issue oriented. As a group, that is the conservative base of the republican party. I have shown you just a fraction of the majority leaders voting positions.  The reason I ask for a list is to make the person I am communicating with to think. What are my top issues and who votes for them. That is when people see just how they have been deceived. Any one who is calling for a disconnect with the religious right are distancing themselves from issues I have listed. What I have found the mod&#039;s &amp; lib&#039;s want to boycott Wal-Mart, raise minimum wage, forgive debt to foreign countries and put Al Gore&#039;s movie suggestion in place. These Christian have been fooled. Remember Christ was all about people everything else comes in a far second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fourth, being a Christian we try to live life the way Christ would of, that includes voting. Since Christ never voted (He never had the freedom in those days), we must look at the issues and vote for the candidate that would be both electable and our issue oriented. As a group, that is the conservative base of the republican party. I have shown you just a fraction of the majority leaders voting positions.  The reason I ask for a list is to make the person I am communicating with to think. What are my top issues and who votes for them. That is when people see just how they have been deceived. Any one who is calling for a disconnect with the religious right are distancing themselves from issues I have listed. What I have found the mod&#8217;s &#038; lib&#8217;s want to boycott Wal-Mart, raise minimum wage, forgive debt to foreign countries and put Al Gore&#8217;s movie suggestion in place. These Christian have been fooled. Remember Christ was all about people everything else comes in a far second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Pelosi

Despite Widespread Public Support, Rep. Pelosi Voted At Least Three Times Against Unborn Victims Of Violence Act (Laci&#039;s Law). (H.R. 1997, CQ Vote #31: Passed 254-163: R 207-13; D 47-149; I 0-1, 2/26/04, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 503, CQ Vote #89: Passed 252-172: R 198-21; D 53-150; I 1-1, 4/26/01, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 2436, CQ Vote #465: Passed 254-172: R 198-21; D 56-150; I 0-1, 9/30/99, Pelosi Voted Nay)

Rep. Pelosi Voted At Least Three Times In Favor Of Allowing FDA To Use Federal Funds To Test, Develop And/Or Approve Drugs That Chemically Induce Abortion. (H.R. 4101, CQ Vote #260: Adopted 223-202: R 188-37; D 35-164; I 0-1, 6/24/98, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 1906, CQ Vote #173: Adopted 217-214: R 181-40; D 36-173; I 0-1, 6/8/99, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 4461, CQ Vote #373: Rejected 182-187: R 149-34; D 32-152; I 1-1, 7/10/00, Pelosi Voted Nay)

Rep. Pelosi Has Voted For Higher Gas Taxes At Least 5 Times. (H.R. 3566, CQ Vote #338: Passed 343-83: R 101-61; D 241-22; I 1-0, 10/23/91, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #199: Passed 219-314: R 0-175; D 218-38; I 1-0, 5/27/93, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 3415, CQ Vote #182: Passed 301-108: R 208-15; D 92-93; I 1-0, 5/21/96, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 2400, CQ Vote #97: Rejected 98-318: R 82-138; D 16-179; I 0-1, 4/1/98, Pelosi Voted Nay

Rep. Pelosi Received A 100 Percent Rating From NARAL Pro-Choice America In 2005. (NARAL Website, www.naral.org, Accessed 4/26/06) 

Rep. Pelosi Received A Zero Percent Rating From National Right To Life Committee In 2005. (National Right To Life Committee Website, www.capwiz.com, Accessed 4/26/06)

So much for &quot;blind voting&quot;. Enough said!

First, it&#039;s a given, when Jesus came into contact with anyone, he came into contact with a sinner. That is not up debate or what we are discussing. 

Second, I have experienced when I start taking specifics with mod&#039;s or lib&#039;s they dance around that specific subject. Mod&#039;s &amp; lib&#039;s love talking in general. Example, to feed the world, what a noble cause(feel good stuff). When asked how and what plans to do this, if they don&#039;t want to tax me to death, they call names like narrow minded for thinking small. It is their way of saying &quot;I have no clue&quot;. Conservatives have specifics. I will say it again, this has been my experience.

Third, I have taken my list from a so called &quot;extreme right wing&quot; web site. These are the issue the extreme right wing are pushing, we own these issues.  I am sure that mod&#039;s or even a couple of lib&#039;s have voted on the above issues and on my list but that is the few and far in between. Again, I say just give me a couple of issues that we can verify with scripture that the right wing have not brought up or attempting to solve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi</p>
<p>Despite Widespread Public Support, Rep. Pelosi Voted At Least Three Times Against Unborn Victims Of Violence Act (Laci&#8217;s Law). (H.R. 1997, CQ Vote #31: Passed 254-163: R 207-13; D 47-149; I 0-1, 2/26/04, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 503, CQ Vote #89: Passed 252-172: R 198-21; D 53-150; I 1-1, 4/26/01, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 2436, CQ Vote #465: Passed 254-172: R 198-21; D 56-150; I 0-1, 9/30/99, Pelosi Voted Nay)</p>
<p>Rep. Pelosi Voted At Least Three Times In Favor Of Allowing FDA To Use Federal Funds To Test, Develop And/Or Approve Drugs That Chemically Induce Abortion. (H.R. 4101, CQ Vote #260: Adopted 223-202: R 188-37; D 35-164; I 0-1, 6/24/98, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 1906, CQ Vote #173: Adopted 217-214: R 181-40; D 36-173; I 0-1, 6/8/99, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 4461, CQ Vote #373: Rejected 182-187: R 149-34; D 32-152; I 1-1, 7/10/00, Pelosi Voted Nay)</p>
<p>Rep. Pelosi Has Voted For Higher Gas Taxes At Least 5 Times. (H.R. 3566, CQ Vote #338: Passed 343-83: R 101-61; D 241-22; I 1-0, 10/23/91, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #199: Passed 219-314: R 0-175; D 218-38; I 1-0, 5/27/93, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #406: Adopted 218-216: R 0-175; D 217-41; I 1-0, 8/5/93, Pelosi Voted Yea; H.R. 3415, CQ Vote #182: Passed 301-108: R 208-15; D 92-93; I 1-0, 5/21/96, Pelosi Voted Nay; H.R. 2400, CQ Vote #97: Rejected 98-318: R 82-138; D 16-179; I 0-1, 4/1/98, Pelosi Voted Nay</p>
<p>Rep. Pelosi Received A 100 Percent Rating From NARAL Pro-Choice America In 2005. (NARAL Website, <a href="http://www.naral.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.naral.org</a>, Accessed 4/26/06) </p>
<p>Rep. Pelosi Received A Zero Percent Rating From National Right To Life Committee In 2005. (National Right To Life Committee Website, <a href="http://www.capwiz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.capwiz.com</a>, Accessed 4/26/06)</p>
<p>So much for &#8220;blind voting&#8221;. Enough said!</p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s a given, when Jesus came into contact with anyone, he came into contact with a sinner. That is not up debate or what we are discussing. </p>
<p>Second, I have experienced when I start taking specifics with mod&#8217;s or lib&#8217;s they dance around that specific subject. Mod&#8217;s &#038; lib&#8217;s love talking in general. Example, to feed the world, what a noble cause(feel good stuff). When asked how and what plans to do this, if they don&#8217;t want to tax me to death, they call names like narrow minded for thinking small. It is their way of saying &#8220;I have no clue&#8221;. Conservatives have specifics. I will say it again, this has been my experience.</p>
<p>Third, I have taken my list from a so called &#8220;extreme right wing&#8221; web site. These are the issue the extreme right wing are pushing, we own these issues.  I am sure that mod&#8217;s or even a couple of lib&#8217;s have voted on the above issues and on my list but that is the few and far in between. Again, I say just give me a couple of issues that we can verify with scripture that the right wing have not brought up or attempting to solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Internet Gambling  Prohibition
Act of 1999   
(H.R. 3125) R-201 along with D- 115 pass this bill
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363
 
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act 
R-228  along with D-161 bill passes
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2005-35

Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act 
R-223  along with D-98
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-401
 
WASHINGTON (August 14, 2006) -- Both houses of Congress have passed bills to protect the rights of parents to be notified before an abortion is performed on a minor daughter – but Senate Democratic leaders, led by Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.), have thrown up an extraordinary procedural obstacle in an attempt to prevent the bill from becoming law during the final weeks of the 109th Congress. 
 
We must remember people are first with Christ everything else is a far second. These are people issues. Do not listen to the talking points but look how they vote or what they try to block. One question I ask my debating opponents is &quot;Give me a reason to support and vote for your candidate&quot;. could not give me examples to at least considering a moderate or lib? &quot;Blindly voting&quot;, I gave you almost 40 issue that the conservatives voted on. Hardly blind voting. I know how candidates vote.
Harry Reid

Reid Voted Initially For A Substitute Bill That Would Have “Gutted” The Partial Birth Abortion Ban. (Fred Barnes, Op-Ed, “When Harry Met Roe,” The Weekly Standard, 12/27/04; S. 1692, CQ Vote #335: Motion Agreed To 61-38: R 50-3; D 10-35; I 1-0, 10/20/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. 3, CQ Vote #46: Approved 60-38: R 47-4; D 12-34; I 1-0, 3/12/03, Reid Voted Nay) 

Reid Supported Legislation Watering Down The Laci Peterson Law. (H.R. 1997, CQ Vote #61: Rejected 49-50: R 4-47; D 44-3; I 1-0, 3/25/04, Reid Voted Yea) 

Reid Voted To Overturn Reinstatement Of Mexico City Policy, Which Bars Funds From Being Given To Overseas Organizations That Perform Or Promote Abortions. (S. 925, CQ Vote #267: Rejected 43-53: R 42-9; D 1-43; I 0-1, 7/9/03, Reid Voted Nay)

Reid Voted Against Marriage Penalty Relief At Least 20 Times. (S. Con. Res. 13, CQ Vote # 178: Rejected 31-69: R 31-23; D 0-46, 5/23/95, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1357, CQ Vote #552: Motion Agreed To 53-46: R 50-3; D 3-43, 10/27/95, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2491, CQ Vote #556: Passed 52-47: R 52-1; D 0-46, 10/28/95, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2491, CQ Vote #584: Motion Agreed To 52-47: R 52-1; D 0-46, 11/18/95, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1415, CQ Vote #154: Rejected 48-50: R 5-49; D 43-1, 6/10/98, Reid Voted Yea; S. 2312, CQ Vote #242: Motion Rejected 48-51: R 4-50; D 44-1, 7/29/98, Reid Voted Yea; S. 1429, CQ Vote #230: Rejected 46-54: R 45-9; D 0-45; I 1-0, 7/29/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1429 CQ Vote #247: Passed 57-43: R 52-2; D 4-41; I 1-0, 7/30/99, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2488, CQ Vote #261: Adopted 50-49: R 49-4; D 0-45; I 1-0, 8/5/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. Con. Res. 101, CQ Vote #68: Rejected 44-56: R 5-50; D 39</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Gambling  Prohibition<br />
Act of 1999<br />
(H.R. 3125) R-201 along with D- 115 pass this bill<br />
<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-363</a></p>
<p>Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act<br />
R-228  along with D-161 bill passes<br />
<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2005-35" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2005-35</a></p>
<p>Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act<br />
R-223  along with D-98<br />
<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-401" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2006-401</a></p>
<p>WASHINGTON (August 14, 2006) &#8212; Both houses of Congress have passed bills to protect the rights of parents to be notified before an abortion is performed on a minor daughter – but Senate Democratic leaders, led by Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.), have thrown up an extraordinary procedural obstacle in an attempt to prevent the bill from becoming law during the final weeks of the 109th Congress. </p>
<p>We must remember people are first with Christ everything else is a far second. These are people issues. Do not listen to the talking points but look how they vote or what they try to block. One question I ask my debating opponents is &#8220;Give me a reason to support and vote for your candidate&#8221;. could not give me examples to at least considering a moderate or lib? &#8220;Blindly voting&#8221;, I gave you almost 40 issue that the conservatives voted on. Hardly blind voting. I know how candidates vote.<br />
Harry Reid</p>
<p>Reid Voted Initially For A Substitute Bill That Would Have “Gutted” The Partial Birth Abortion Ban. (Fred Barnes, Op-Ed, “When Harry Met Roe,” The Weekly Standard, 12/27/04; S. 1692, CQ Vote #335: Motion Agreed To 61-38: R 50-3; D 10-35; I 1-0, 10/20/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. 3, CQ Vote #46: Approved 60-38: R 47-4; D 12-34; I 1-0, 3/12/03, Reid Voted Nay) </p>
<p>Reid Supported Legislation Watering Down The Laci Peterson Law. (H.R. 1997, CQ Vote #61: Rejected 49-50: R 4-47; D 44-3; I 1-0, 3/25/04, Reid Voted Yea) </p>
<p>Reid Voted To Overturn Reinstatement Of Mexico City Policy, Which Bars Funds From Being Given To Overseas Organizations That Perform Or Promote Abortions. (S. 925, CQ Vote #267: Rejected 43-53: R 42-9; D 1-43; I 0-1, 7/9/03, Reid Voted Nay)</p>
<p>Reid Voted Against Marriage Penalty Relief At Least 20 Times. (S. Con. Res. 13, CQ Vote # 178: Rejected 31-69: R 31-23; D 0-46, 5/23/95, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1357, CQ Vote #552: Motion Agreed To 53-46: R 50-3; D 3-43, 10/27/95, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2491, CQ Vote #556: Passed 52-47: R 52-1; D 0-46, 10/28/95, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2491, CQ Vote #584: Motion Agreed To 52-47: R 52-1; D 0-46, 11/18/95, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1415, CQ Vote #154: Rejected 48-50: R 5-49; D 43-1, 6/10/98, Reid Voted Yea; S. 2312, CQ Vote #242: Motion Rejected 48-51: R 4-50; D 44-1, 7/29/98, Reid Voted Yea; S. 1429, CQ Vote #230: Rejected 46-54: R 45-9; D 0-45; I 1-0, 7/29/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. 1429 CQ Vote #247: Passed 57-43: R 52-2; D 4-41; I 1-0, 7/30/99, Reid Voted Nay; H.R. 2488, CQ Vote #261: Adopted 50-49: R 49-4; D 0-45; I 1-0, 8/5/99, Reid Voted Nay; S. Con. Res. 101, CQ Vote #68: Rejected 44-56: R 5-50; D 39</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Good points, PK.  And I would venture to guess that by hanging out with that crowd He probably would end being associated with them by the religious people of today, just like he was then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, PK.  And I would venture to guess that by hanging out with that crowd He probably would end being associated with them by the religious people of today, just like he was then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Dan, 

Do you not realize that ...by the example set in the New Testament ... if it was today&#039;s time... 

Jesus would be seen ... sitting with the gays, having dinner with the divorced and the broken family&#039;s ... he&#039;d be talking with those who&#039;ve had abortions ... and on Sunday morning&#039;s he&#039;d be walking down under the bridges and over passes spreading the love of His Father. 

He would not be in the churches ... coddling us with cliques and cliches ..telling us that we&#039;re right to stay in our boxes and not be touched by the poison that is the world. 

We would not know if he was republican or democrat. I would bet he would vote ...but I would also bet that he would keep that information to himself ...and then give a vague answer ... like when he was asked about paying taxes. Rather than just saying YES you should pay taxes ... he said render to ceasars what is Ceasars and to God what is God&#039;s ... He&#039;d simply let us know that it is our responsibility to do what God has given us to do. 

One thing is sure ... it would be the sick, and the lost and the worn out and those that need Him that he would be ministering to ... and it would the pious religous people make it impossible for the lost to come to him that he would save his ire for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, </p>
<p>Do you not realize that &#8230;by the example set in the New Testament &#8230; if it was today&#8217;s time&#8230; </p>
<p>Jesus would be seen &#8230; sitting with the gays, having dinner with the divorced and the broken family&#8217;s &#8230; he&#8217;d be talking with those who&#8217;ve had abortions &#8230; and on Sunday morning&#8217;s he&#8217;d be walking down under the bridges and over passes spreading the love of His Father. </p>
<p>He would not be in the churches &#8230; coddling us with cliques and cliches ..telling us that we&#8217;re right to stay in our boxes and not be touched by the poison that is the world. </p>
<p>We would not know if he was republican or democrat. I would bet he would vote &#8230;but I would also bet that he would keep that information to himself &#8230;and then give a vague answer &#8230; like when he was asked about paying taxes. Rather than just saying YES you should pay taxes &#8230; he said render to ceasars what is Ceasars and to God what is God&#8217;s &#8230; He&#8217;d simply let us know that it is our responsibility to do what God has given us to do. </p>
<p>One thing is sure &#8230; it would be the sick, and the lost and the worn out and those that need Him that he would be ministering to &#8230; and it would the pious religous people make it impossible for the lost to come to him that he would save his ire for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Dan,

We could honestly get into a battle of lists and I could show how some of the the things in your list are really not help by the Republican party and how there are some things that the Democrats or even moderates are closer to in terms of fulfilling things that I believe are close to the heart of God.  But honestly, I think it is fruitless.  I think that doing what we can to bring heaven to earth is much more important.

And I think just blindly voting Republican, just because you think &quot;Jesus would vote for a &#039;religious right winger&#039;&quot;, is pretty foolish.  After all, Jesus did pose some pretty liberal thoughts in his day and rebelled against the authority.  Not to mention the fact that he always seemed to reject the politics of the day and instead went about doing the will of the Father.  Please, don&#039;t misconstrue that and think that I am saying we shouldn&#039;t vote.  But I am saying that I think there is more important things to turn our focus towards.

BTW, I was not being politically correct by saying that Jesus is not a Republican or a Democrat.  I was stating a fact and until you can prove to me with Biblical facts that Jesus was and is a Republican, I think that it is just foolishness.  I am first, foremost and only a Christian and my relationship with Christ is and will effect the way I vote next year.  And my vote will go to the person that I feel meets the things I am finding most important to the heart of God with the list I gave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>We could honestly get into a battle of lists and I could show how some of the the things in your list are really not help by the Republican party and how there are some things that the Democrats or even moderates are closer to in terms of fulfilling things that I believe are close to the heart of God.  But honestly, I think it is fruitless.  I think that doing what we can to bring heaven to earth is much more important.</p>
<p>And I think just blindly voting Republican, just because you think &#8220;Jesus would vote for a &#8216;religious right winger&#8217;&#8221;, is pretty foolish.  After all, Jesus did pose some pretty liberal thoughts in his day and rebelled against the authority.  Not to mention the fact that he always seemed to reject the politics of the day and instead went about doing the will of the Father.  Please, don&#8217;t misconstrue that and think that I am saying we shouldn&#8217;t vote.  But I am saying that I think there is more important things to turn our focus towards.</p>
<p>BTW, I was not being politically correct by saying that Jesus is not a Republican or a Democrat.  I was stating a fact and until you can prove to me with Biblical facts that Jesus was and is a Republican, I think that it is just foolishness.  I am first, foremost and only a Christian and my relationship with Christ is and will effect the way I vote next year.  And my vote will go to the person that I feel meets the things I am finding most important to the heart of God with the list I gave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesnuffy.com/2007/02/23/my-vote-for-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesnuffy.com/?p=250#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Todd,

    The only thing that gets me more excited than politics is taking about Christ. 

You have me on the first question. I do not see a republican let alone a democrat that even comes close to anything to do with Christ. The closest I believe we will get is Newt Gingrich. I do mean the closest is Newt. 

        I would love to address the &quot;Jesus is not a republican or democrat&quot;. I have heard this from pastors and people who want to be politically correct. Here is why I think Jesus is a conservative and would vote conservative. 

Abortion 
Internet Gambling Prohibition Act 
Broadcast Decency Act 
religious liberty 
Fetal Farming Ban 
Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act 
Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act 
defunding of a $300 million grant to build a gay-lesbian center in Los Angeles
Freedom to Display the American Flag Act 
Child Pornography Prevention Act 
Child Custody Protection Act
Abstinence &amp; education
No condoms @ school
no gay marriage
No gay adoption
No hate crime legislation
No gay school support groups
Library internet filters
Do away with pornography
marriage protection act
No sex ed in school
Pro ten commandments
Religious freedom in public
Abortion counseling
Keep ban on international abortion support
Adoption 
Adoption not for homosexuals
No assisted suicide
Proper Bioethics
Capital punishment
No cloning
No euthanasia
No morning after pill (RU-486)
Parental notification for under aged abortion
No partial birth abortion
No stem cell research
Feeding all people 


These are a few issues that conservatives and I do believe Jesus would agree with. So based on this list, Jesus would vote for a &quot;religious right winger&quot;. I can not say that the republicans in the race today Jesus would be to excited about,  But compared to the democratic field, it would be very easy choice. I would love to see a list that democrats or moderates support that Jesus would be excited about. I will address your other list this weekend. I do believe you will be surprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>    The only thing that gets me more excited than politics is taking about Christ. </p>
<p>You have me on the first question. I do not see a republican let alone a democrat that even comes close to anything to do with Christ. The closest I believe we will get is Newt Gingrich. I do mean the closest is Newt. </p>
<p>        I would love to address the &#8220;Jesus is not a republican or democrat&#8221;. I have heard this from pastors and people who want to be politically correct. Here is why I think Jesus is a conservative and would vote conservative. </p>
<p>Abortion<br />
Internet Gambling Prohibition Act<br />
Broadcast Decency Act<br />
religious liberty<br />
Fetal Farming Ban<br />
Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act<br />
Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act<br />
defunding of a $300 million grant to build a gay-lesbian center in Los Angeles<br />
Freedom to Display the American Flag Act<br />
Child Pornography Prevention Act<br />
Child Custody Protection Act<br />
Abstinence &#038; education<br />
No condoms @ school<br />
no gay marriage<br />
No gay adoption<br />
No hate crime legislation<br />
No gay school support groups<br />
Library internet filters<br />
Do away with pornography<br />
marriage protection act<br />
No sex ed in school<br />
Pro ten commandments<br />
Religious freedom in public<br />
Abortion counseling<br />
Keep ban on international abortion support<br />
Adoption<br />
Adoption not for homosexuals<br />
No assisted suicide<br />
Proper Bioethics<br />
Capital punishment<br />
No cloning<br />
No euthanasia<br />
No morning after pill (RU-486)<br />
Parental notification for under aged abortion<br />
No partial birth abortion<br />
No stem cell research<br />
Feeding all people </p>
<p>These are a few issues that conservatives and I do believe Jesus would agree with. So based on this list, Jesus would vote for a &#8220;religious right winger&#8221;. I can not say that the republicans in the race today Jesus would be to excited about,  But compared to the democratic field, it would be very easy choice. I would love to see a list that democrats or moderates support that Jesus would be excited about. I will address your other list this weekend. I do believe you will be surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

